@article {8157, title = {Die Schmetterlingsfauna des WWF-Naturreservates "Hundsheimer Berge" in Nieder{\"o}sterreich}, journal = {Zeitschrift der Arbeitsgemeinschaft {\"O}sterreichischer Entomologen}, volume = {34 Supplement}, year = {1983}, pages = {1-48}, abstract = {

In the area of the WWF-Nature Reserve \"Hundsheimer Berge\" in eastern Austria approximately 1350 species of Micro- and Macrolepidoptera have been found. 35 of them should have developed in the surrounding of the Nature Reserve. The remaining 1315 species are nearly 40\% of the total Lepidoptera fauna of Lower Austria. 110 species are value of the point of view of conservation for Middle Europe. One Gelechiid species, a new Teleiodes, is described by SATTLER in this paper. 17 species have proofed as new for the Lepidoptera fauna of Austria. Noteworthy is the extremely high percentage of melanistic specimens in Ypsolopha sequella (CL.).

}, keywords = {Austria, Ectoedemia albifasciella, Ectoedemia amani, Ectoedemia angulifasciella, Ectoedemia atricollis, Ectoedemia atrifrontella, Ectoedemia contorta, Ectoedemia heringi, Ectoedemia klimeschi, Ectoedemia longicaudella, Ectoedemia louisella, Ectoedemia mahalebella, Ectoedemia rufifrontella, Ectoedemia septembrella, Ectoedemia spinosella, Ectoedemia turbidella, Etainia louisella, Fomoria septembrella, Lepidoptera, Nepticulidae, Opostegidae, Parafomoria helianthemella, Pseudopostega crepusculella, Stigmella aceris, Stigmella carpinella, Stigmella catharticella, Stigmella crataegella, Stigmella dorsiguttella, Stigmella eberhardi, Stigmella floslactella, Stigmella hemargyrella, Stigmella hybnerella, Stigmella microtheriella, Stigmella paradoxa, Stigmella perpygmaeella, Stigmella plagicolella, Stigmella prunetorum, Stigmella thuringiaca, Stigmella tiliae, Stigmella trimaculella, Stigmella ulmivora, Trifurcula bleonella, Trifurcula chamaecytisi, Trifurcula josefklimeschi, Trifurcula pallidella, Trifurcula subnitidella, Trifurcula thymi, Zimmermannia}, url = {http://www.zobodat.at/pdf/ZAOE_S2_0001-0048.pdf}, author = {Kasy, F.} } @article {7681, title = {A global phylogeny of leafmining Ectoedemia moths (Lepidoptera: Nepticulidae): exploring host plant family shifts and allopatry as drivers of speciation}, journal = {PLOS one}, volume = {10}, number = {3}, year = {2015}, month = {2015-03-18}, pages = {e0119586}, edition = {2015-03-18}, abstract = {

Background:Host association patterns that are seen in Ectoedemia species (Lepidoptera: Nepticulidae) are also encountered in other insect groups with intimate plant relationships, including a high degree of monophagy, a preference for dominant plant families (e.g. Fagaceae, Rosaceae, Salicaceae and Betulaceae) and a tendency for related insect species to feed on related host plant species. The evolutionary processes underlying these patterns are only partly understood, we therefore aimed to use a species-level phylogeny of the leaf mining moth subgenus Ectoedemia to assess the role of allopatry and host plant family shifts in speciation. Methodology:Six nuclear and mitochondrial DNA markers with a total aligned length of 3692 base pairs were used to infer phylogenetic relationships among 94 species belonging to the subgenus Ectoedemia of the genus Ectoedemia, representing a thorough taxon sampling with a global coverage. The results support monophyletic species groups that are congruent with published findings based on morphology. We used the obtained phylogeny to explore host plant family association and geographical distribution to investigate if host shifts and allopatry have been instrumental in the speciation of these leaf mining insects.Significance:We found that, even though most species within species groups commonly feed on plants from one family, shifts to a distantly related host family have occasionally occurred throughout the phylogeny and such shifts are most commonly observed towards Betulaceae. The largest radiations have occurred within species groups that feed on Fagaceae, Rosaceae and Salicaceae. Using the seven global biogeographic regions to demarcate allopatric distribution we found that most species are restricted to a single biogeographic region, but that within species groups representatives are commonly found in different biogeographic regions. Although we find similar patterns with regard to host use and biogeography, there are differences between clades that suggest that different drivers of speciation, and perhaps drivers that we did not examine, have shaped diversity patterns in different clades.

}, keywords = {Ectoedemia, Ectoedemia aegilopidella, Ectoedemia agrimoniae, Ectoedemia albifasciella, Ectoedemia algeriensis, Ectoedemia alnifoliae, Ectoedemia amani, Ectoedemia andalusiae, Ectoedemia angulifasciella, Ectoedemia Annamocarya_Vietnam, Ectoedemia arcuatella, Ectoedemia argyropeza, Ectoedemia arisi, Ectoedemia atricollis, Ectoedemia atrifrontella, Ectoedemia canutus, Ectoedemia caradjai, Ectoedemia Carpinus_Taiwan, Ectoedemia Carpinus_Vietnam, Ectoedemia cerris, Ectoedemia cerviparadisicola, Ectoedemia chasanella, Ectoedemia christopheri, Ectoedemia clemensella, Ectoedemia contorta, Ectoedemia coscoja, Ectoedemia erythrogenella, Ectoedemia expeditionis, Ectoedemia gilvipennella, Ectoedemia hannoverella, Ectoedemia haraldi, Ectoedemia heckfordi, Ectoedemia hendrikseni, Ectoedemia heringella, Ectoedemia heringi, Ectoedemia ilicis, Ectoedemia intimella, Ectoedemia ivinskisi, Ectoedemia KenyaEvN4438, Ectoedemia klimeschi, Ectoedemia leucothorax, Ectoedemia liebwerdella, Ectoedemia liechtensteini, Ectoedemia longicaudella, Ectoedemia mahalebella, Ectoedemia minimella, Ectoedemia nr_canutus, Ectoedemia nyssaefoliella, Ectoedemia occultella, Ectoedemia olvina, Ectoedemia ornatella, Ectoedemia phaeolepis, Ectoedemia phyllotomella, Ectoedemia picturata, Ectoedemia pilosae, Ectoedemia piperella, Ectoedemia platanella, Ectoedemia populella, Ectoedemia preisseckeri, Ectoedemia pseudoilicis, Ectoedemia pubescivora, Ectoedemia quadrinotata, Ectoedemia quinquella, Ectoedemia reichli, Ectoedemia rosae, Ectoedemia rubifoliella, Ectoedemia rubivora, Ectoedemia rufifrontella, Ectoedemia similella, Ectoedemia spinosella, Ectoedemia spiraeae, Ectoedemia subbimaculella, Ectoedemia suberis, Ectoedemia terebinthivora, Ectoedemia tersiusi, Ectoedemia trinotata, Ectoedemia turbidella, Ectoedemia ulmella, Ectoedemia virgulae, Lepidoptera, Nepticulidae, Phylogenetic analyses, Zimmermannia}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0119586}, url = {http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0119586}, author = {Doorenweerd, Camiel and Nieukerken, Erik J. van and Menken, Steph B. J.} } @article {5993, title = {A taxonomic revision of the western Palaearctic species of the subgenera Zimmermannia Hering and Ectoedemia Busck s. str. (Lepidoptera, Nepticulidae), with notes on their phylogeny}, journal = {Tijdschrift voor Entomologie}, volume = {128}, number = {1}, year = {1985}, month = {1985-12-20}, pages = {1-164}, abstract = {

The subgenera Zimmermannia Hering and Ectoedemia s.str., together forming the genus Ectoedemia Busck sensu Wilkinson \& Newton (1981) are described and redefined, and the Western Palaearctic species are revised. In total 50 species are recognised, including the new species hispanica, monemvasiae, nuristanica in Zimmermannia and andalusiae, algeriensis, leucothorax, alnifoliae, contorta and two unnamed species in Ectoedemia s.str. Fifteen new synonymies and ten new combinations are established and 42 lectotypes are designated. Primary types have been examined in many cases. Data on larvae and biology are included and keys to all species are provided. The monophyly and the sister group relationships of both subgenera are demonstrated. The subgenus Ectoedemia can be divided into the populella group, suberis group, subbimaculella group and occultella group, being monophyletic entities, and the possibly paraphyletic angulifasciella group. Two alternative hypotheses of the phylogeny within Ectoedemia s.str. are presented. Decisions on species discrimination have in many cases been corroborated by study of allozymes.

}, keywords = {Algeria, Corsica, Croatia, Ectoedemia, Ectoedemia aegilopidella, Ectoedemia agrimoniae, Ectoedemia albida, Ectoedemia albifasciella, Ectoedemia algeriensis, Ectoedemia alnifoliae, Ectoedemia amani, Ectoedemia andalusiae, Ectoedemia angulifasciella, Ectoedemia arcuatella, Ectoedemia argyropeza, Ectoedemia atricollis, Ectoedemia atrifrontella, Ectoedemia caradjai, Ectoedemia cerris, Ectoedemia contorta, Ectoedemia coscoja, Ectoedemia erythrogenella, Ectoedemia gilvipennella, Ectoedemia hannoverella, Ectoedemia haraldi, Ectoedemia heringella, Ectoedemia heringi, Ectoedemia hexapetalae, Ectoedemia hispanica, Ectoedemia ilicis, Ectoedemia intimella, Ectoedemia klimeschi, Ectoedemia leucothorax, Ectoedemia liebwerdella, Ectoedemia liechtensteini, Ectoedemia liguricella, Ectoedemia longicaudella, Ectoedemia mahalebella, Ectoedemia minimella, Ectoedemia monemvasiae, Ectoedemia nuristanica, Ectoedemia occultella, Ectoedemia phaeolepis, Ectoedemia phyllotomella, Ectoedemia preisseckeri, Ectoedemia pubescivora, Ectoedemia quinquella, Ectoedemia rubivora, Ectoedemia rufifrontella, Ectoedemia spinosella, Ectoedemia spiraeae, Ectoedemia subbimaculella, Ectoedemia suberis, Ectoedemia terebinthivora, Ectoedemia turbidella, Europe, France, Greece, Iran, Italy, Lepidoptera, Morocco, Nepticulidae, New combinations, New species, Portugal, Sardinia, Sicily, Spain, Tunisia, Turkey, Zimmermannia}, url = {http://biodiversitylibrary.org/part/69300}, author = {Erik J. van Nieukerken} }